From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tyler v. O'Neill

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
May 22, 2006
Civil Action No. 03-3139 (E.D. Pa. May. 22, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 03-3139.

May 22, 2006


MEMORANDUM/ORDER


AND NOW, upon consideration of "Plaintiff Gary Tyler's Motion in Limine to Permit Use of Certain Deposition and Trial Testimony Pursuant to Fed.R.Evid. 804(b)(1)" (Docket # 37), and defendant George O'Neill's response thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. Plaintiff has demonstrated that, applying the standard announced in Lloyd v. American Export Lines, Inc., 580 F.2d 1179, 1187 (3d Cir. 1978), O'Neill is a successor in interest to William H. Hendrickson, Inc. for purposes of this motion. Plaintiff will be permitted to offer at trial in the instant case deposition and trial testimony obtained from Amtrak employees Harry Glembocki, Douglas Hamilton, Robert McGowan, and/or Tom Butler in connection with the matter of William M. Hendrickson, Inc. v. Amtrak, No. 00-3711 (E.D. Pa.) if, and only if, said individuals are unavailable, within the meaning of FED. R. EVID. 804(a), to testify at trial in the instant case.


Summaries of

Tyler v. O'Neill

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
May 22, 2006
Civil Action No. 03-3139 (E.D. Pa. May. 22, 2006)
Case details for

Tyler v. O'Neill

Case Details

Full title:GARY C. TYLER, et al. Plaintiffs, v. GEORGE O'NEILL and WILLIAM H…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: May 22, 2006

Citations

Civil Action No. 03-3139 (E.D. Pa. May. 22, 2006)