Opinion
Case No: C 06-7164 SBA.
October 6, 2011
ORDER Docket 349
On September 28, 2011, the instant action was reassigned to this Court from Judge Jeremy Fogel. Two days later on September 30, 2011, Plaintiff filed a "Request for Permission to File Motion for Clarification and/or Reconsideration." Dkt. 349. Plaintiff's motion seeks leave to file a motion for clarification or reconsideration of Judge Fogel's ruling issued on September 19, 2011.
The Court's Civil Standing Orders contain the following requirement: "3. Meet and Confer Requirement: All parties are required to meet and confer before filing any motion or any non-stipulated request with this court, and to certify that they have complied with this requirement." Dkt. 348 at 5:8-9. The parties are warned that the Court may not consider papers that are not in compliance with the Court's Standing Orders. Id. at 5:23-25. Here, there is no indication in Plaintiff's motion that it met and conferred with Defendants prior to filing said motion. In addition, Plaintiff's motion fails to comport with Civil Local Rule 7-9, which governs motions for reconsideration. Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Plaintiff's Request for Permission to File Motion for Clarification and/or Reconsideration is DENIED without prejudice. This Order terminates Docket 349.
IT IS SO ORDERED.