From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

TYCO Healthcare Grp. LP v. Total Vein Solutions, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Nov 15, 2011
Case No. C08-3129-MMC (N.D. Cal. Nov. 15, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. C08-3129-MMC Case No. C08-04234 MMC

11-15-2011

TYCO HEALTHCARE GROUP LP d/b/a VNUS MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES, Plaintiff/Counter-defendants, v. TOTAL VEIN SOLUTIONS, LLC, d/b/a TOTAL VEIN SYSTEMS , Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs.

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT TOTAL VEIN SOLUTIONS, LLC d/b/a TOTAL VEIN SYSTEMS, John Karl Buche (SBN 239477) BUCHE & ASSOCIATES, P.C. - and - Dwayne L. Mason (Pro Hac Vice) Shari L. Heyen (Pro Hac Vice) GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF TYCO HEALTHCARE GROUP LP d/b/a VNUS MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES Matthew B. Lehr (Bar No. 213139) Diem-Suong T. Nguyen (Bar No. 237557 ) DAVIS POLK & WARDWELL LLP


John Karl Buche (SBN 239477)

BUCHE & ASSOCIATES, P.C.

- and

Dwayne L. Mason (Pro Hac Vice)

Shari L. Heyen (Pro Hac Vice)

GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP

Attorneys for Defendant,

TOTAL VEIN SOLUTIONS, LLC

ORDER GRANTING

JOINT STIPULATED MOTION AND

[PROPOSED] ORDER BY VNUS AND

TVS FOR DISMISSAL OF TVS AND

PARTIAL VACATUR OF VERDICT

Judge: The Hon. Maxine M. Chesney

WHEREAS, Plaintiff Tyco Healthcare Group LP d/b/a VNUS Medical Technologies ("VNUS") and Defendant Total Vein Solutions, LLC ("TVS") have entered into a Settlement Agreement resolving, inter alia, all claims asserted by VNUS against TVS and all counterclaims asserted by TVS against VNUS in the above-captioned action; and

WHEREAS the Settlement Agreement expressly contemplates the dismissal and vacatur provided for herein, so that dismissal and vacatur will resolve all pending litigation between VNUS and TVS, including those matters contained in the Settlement Agreement.

NOW THEREFORE, VNUS and TVS hereby jointly stipulate and respectfully move the Court for a confirmatory order as follows:

1) The portions of the December 8, 2010 verdict (D.I. 441) corresponding specifically to TVS (i.e., questions 4, 5, 6, 9a & 9b) are hereby VACATED pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). See Thomas v. City of Tacoma, 410 F.3d 644, 647 n.2 (9th Cir. 2005); Click Entm't, Inc. v. JYP Entm't Co., 2009 WL 3030212, at *1 (D. Haw. 2009);
2) TVS is dismissed with prejudice from this action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2);
3) The counterclaims asserted by TVS against VNUS are dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(c);
4) Each party will bear its own fees, costs and expenses; and
5) The caption shall be amended in all subsequent pleadings to reflect this dismissal.

[Remainder of page intentionally left blank.]

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT

TOTAL VEIN SOLUTIONS, LLC

d/b/a TOTAL VEIN SYSTEMS,

John Karl Buche (SBN 239477)

BUCHE & ASSOCIATES, P.C.

- and

Dwayne L. Mason (Pro Hac Vice)

Shari L. Heyen (Pro Hac Vice)

GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP

ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF

TYCO HEALTHCARE GROUP LP d/b/a

VNUS MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES

Matthew B. Lehr (Bar No. 213139)

Diem-Suong T. Nguyen (Bar No. 237557)

DAVIS POLK & WARDWELL LLP

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

THE HON. MAXINE M. CHESNEY

United States District Judge


Summaries of

TYCO Healthcare Grp. LP v. Total Vein Solutions, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Nov 15, 2011
Case No. C08-3129-MMC (N.D. Cal. Nov. 15, 2011)
Case details for

TYCO Healthcare Grp. LP v. Total Vein Solutions, LLC

Case Details

Full title:TYCO HEALTHCARE GROUP LP d/b/a VNUS MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: Nov 15, 2011

Citations

Case No. C08-3129-MMC (N.D. Cal. Nov. 15, 2011)