TWILLEAGER v. RDO VERMEER, LLC

Full title: RICK TWILLEAGER, Plaintiff, v. RDO VERMEER, LLC, doing business as Vermeer…

Court: United States District Court, D. Oregon

Date published: Apr 28, 2011

Civil No. 10-1167-AC (D. Or. Apr. 28, 2011)

Opinion

Civil No. 10-1167-AC.

April 28, 2011

ORDER

MALCOLM MARSH, Senior District Judge

Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta filed his Findings and Recommendation on April 1, 2011. The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R. Civ P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review. See § 636(b)(1)(C); Simpson v. Lear Astronics Corp., 77 F.3d 1170, 1174-5 (9th Cir. 1996). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

Accordingly, I ADOPT Magistrate Judge Acosta's Findings and Recommendation #30. Defendants' Amended Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings (#16) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.