From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Twenty-Third Street Ry. Co. v. New York

U.S.
May 29, 1905
199 U.S. 53 (1905)

Opinion

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK.

Nos. 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80.

Argued April 17, 18, 19, 1905. Decided May 29, 1905.

Metropolitan Street Railway Co. v. New York, ante, p. 1, and Brooklyn City Railroad Co. v. New York, ante, p. 48, followed.

THE facts are stated in the opinion.

Mr. Elihu Root and Mr. William D. Guthrie for plaintiffs in error in Nos. 75 and 76. Mr. Elihu Root, with whom Mr. Frank H. Platt was on the brief, for plaintiffs in error in Nos. 77 and 78.

Mr. Julius M. Mayer, Attorney General of the State of New York, and Mr. Louis Marshall for defendant in error.

Argued simultaneously with Metropolitan Street Ry. Co. v. New York. For abstracts of arguments see ante, p. 9.


While these cases differ in some details from the two preceding, in which opinions have just been announced, there are no such differences as put them outside the scope of the reasoning of those opinions. Therefore, the judgments in them are

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Twenty-Third Street Ry. Co. v. New York

U.S.
May 29, 1905
199 U.S. 53 (1905)
Case details for

Twenty-Third Street Ry. Co. v. New York

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ex rel . TWENTY-THIRD STREET RAILWAY…

Court:U.S.

Date published: May 29, 1905

Citations

199 U.S. 53 (1905)

Citing Cases

Willcox v. Consolidated Gas Co.

Mr. Garver: Special franchises must be included among the assets upon which the company is entitled to a…

State v. G.H. S.A. Ry. Co.

The taxes prescribed by the Act are equal and uniform upon the same class of subjects within the limit of the…