Opinion
No. 74003
OPINION FILED: October 27, 1998
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY, HONORABLE MARK D. SEIGEL, JUDGE.
Frank W. Kriegel, Jr., St. Louis, for appellant.
Blumenfeld, Kaplan Sandweiss, P.C., Evan D. Buxner, St. Louis, for respondent.
Before JAMES R. DOWD, P.J., LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, J.
ORDER
Defendant appeals the grant of plaintiff's motion for summary judgment in an action to enforce a written guaranty. The uncontroverted facts set forth in plaintiffs motion support summary judgment. Defendant's response to summary judgment did not comply with the requirements set forth in Rule 74.04(c)(1) and therefore failed to preserve any dispute of material fact. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).