From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tuttle v. Sky Bell Asset Management, LLC

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California
Oct 17, 2011
C 10-03588 WHA (N.D. Cal. Oct. 17, 2011)

Opinion


EDGAR W. TUTTLE, ERIC BRAUN, THE BRAUN FAMILY TRUST, and WENDY MEG SIEGEL, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. SKY BELL ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC, et al., Defendants. No. C 10-03588 WHA United States District Court, N.D. California. October 17, 2011

          NOTICE

          WILLIAM ALSUP, District Judge.

         Be prepared to answer these questions based on the existing record. Do not try to supplement:

• Was Eric Braun a qualified investor?

• If not, did he ever represent otherwise?

• What does the caselaw hold as to whether it even matters?

• Many people hold investments in an IRA account. What difference should it make that Mr. Braun held this investment via an IRA account?

• Claims 3-5 are not asserted against Rothstein Kass by the Night Watch "class." How can these claims now be included as class claims against Rothstein Kass?

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Tuttle v. Sky Bell Asset Management, LLC

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California
Oct 17, 2011
C 10-03588 WHA (N.D. Cal. Oct. 17, 2011)
Case details for

Tuttle v. Sky Bell Asset Management, LLC

Case Details

Full title:EDGAR W. TUTTLE, ERIC BRAUN, THE BRAUN FAMILY TRUST, and WENDY MEG SIEGEL…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California

Date published: Oct 17, 2011

Citations

C 10-03588 WHA (N.D. Cal. Oct. 17, 2011)