From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tuttle v. Saint Alphonsus Med. Ctr.

United States District Court, District of Oregon
Mar 14, 2023
2:22-cv-01022-HL (D. Or. Mar. 14, 2023)

Opinion

2:22-cv-01022-HL

03-14-2023

JOSIAH TUTTLE, Plaintiff, v. SAINT ALPHONSUS MEDICAL CENTER, Defendant.


ORDER

MARCO A. HERNANDEZ, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Magistrate Judge Hallman issued a Findings and Recommendation on February 16, 2023, in which he recommends that the Court dismiss Plaintiff's complaint without prejudice. F&R, ECF 9. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, the Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of

Magistrate Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court finds no error.

CONCLUSION

The Court adopts Magistrate Judge Hallman's Findings and Recommendation [9].

Accordingly, Plaintiff's Complaint [1] is dismissed without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Tuttle v. Saint Alphonsus Med. Ctr.

United States District Court, District of Oregon
Mar 14, 2023
2:22-cv-01022-HL (D. Or. Mar. 14, 2023)
Case details for

Tuttle v. Saint Alphonsus Med. Ctr.

Case Details

Full title:JOSIAH TUTTLE, Plaintiff, v. SAINT ALPHONSUS MEDICAL CENTER, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, District of Oregon

Date published: Mar 14, 2023

Citations

2:22-cv-01022-HL (D. Or. Mar. 14, 2023)