Opinion
2014-10-3
In the Matter of Susan TUTTLE, Petitioner–Appellant, v. Beth MATEO, Respondent–Respondent. (Appeal No. 2.).
Appeal from an amended order of the Family Court, Ontario County (Maurice E. Strobridge, JHO), entered April 11, 2014 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The amended order denied the petition of respondent to terminate visitation. Davison Law Office PLLC, Canandaigua (Mary P. Davison of Counsel), for Petitioner–Appellant. Robert L. Gosper, Attorney for the Child, Canandaigua.
Appeal from an amended order of the Family Court, Ontario County (Maurice E. Strobridge, JHO), entered April 11, 2014 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The amended order denied the petition of respondent to terminate visitation.
Davison Law Office PLLC, Canandaigua (Mary P. Davison of Counsel), for Petitioner–Appellant. Robert L. Gosper, Attorney for the Child, Canandaigua.
Same Memorandum as in Matter of Tuttle v. Mateo [Appeal No. 3], –––A.D.3d ––––, ––– N.Y.S.2d ––––, 2014 WL 4943990 (Oct. 3, 2014).
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs. SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, VALENTINO, WHALEN, and DeJOSEPH, JJ., concur.