From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tuttle v. Gold

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 11, 1957
3 A.D.2d 760 (N.Y. App. Div. 1957)

Opinion

March 11, 1957


Plaintiff was taking in wash from a clothesline which ran from the window of her third-floor apartment in defendant's building to a clothes pole in the rear yard. The pole snapped and fell to the ground and plaintiff, in an effort to avoid being pulled out of the window, sustained the injuries for which she brought this action in the County Court, Nassau County. The appeal is from a judgment dismissing the complaint at the close of plaintiff's case. Judgment reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event. In our opinion appellant made out a prima facie case. Respondent was duty bound to use reasonable care by way of inspection at appropriate intervals to determine whether the pole was reasonably safe for use. ( Sizse v. Wegmann, 169 App. Div. 112.) It was for the jury to say whether or not the failure to use reasonable care constituted negligence. ( Fornagiel v. Wacholder, 247 App. Div. 305, 308, affd. 272 N.Y. 589.) Beldock, Acting P.J., Murphy, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Tuttle v. Gold

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 11, 1957
3 A.D.2d 760 (N.Y. App. Div. 1957)
Case details for

Tuttle v. Gold

Case Details

Full title:ELIZABETH TUTTLE, Appellant, v. SOL GOLD, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 11, 1957

Citations

3 A.D.2d 760 (N.Y. App. Div. 1957)

Citing Cases

Personius v. Mann

Under such circumstances, we are unpersuaded that Supreme Court erred in dismissing the causes of action…

Jeffries v. State

After trial, the Court of Claims ruled in favor of the State and against the claimant, finding that the State…