From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Turrentine v. Lopez

United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina
Sep 26, 2022
1:17CV100 (M.D.N.C. Sep. 26, 2022)

Opinion

1:17CV100

09-26-2022

ANTONIO LEVON TURRENTINE, Plaintiff, v. LOPEZ, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

On March 22, 2022, the United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation was filed and notice was served on the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. Docs. 81, 82. Plaintiff filed a document which the Court construes as an objection to the Recommendation. See Doc 83. The Court has appropriately reviewed the portions of the Magistrate Judge's report to which objection was made and has made a de novo determination which is in accord with the Magistrate Judge's report.

Therefore, the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation is hereby adopted.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's letter document, docketed as a “Motion to Reopen Case” and construed as a motion for relief under Federal Civil Procedure Rule 60(b) (Doc. 80), is DENIED.


Summaries of

Turrentine v. Lopez

United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina
Sep 26, 2022
1:17CV100 (M.D.N.C. Sep. 26, 2022)
Case details for

Turrentine v. Lopez

Case Details

Full title:ANTONIO LEVON TURRENTINE, Plaintiff, v. LOPEZ, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina

Date published: Sep 26, 2022

Citations

1:17CV100 (M.D.N.C. Sep. 26, 2022)