From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Turner v. Warden, CSP-Sacramento

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 9, 2018
No. 2:18-cv-1180 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 9, 2018)

Opinion

No. 2:18-cv-1180 KJN P

08-09-2018

MICA TURNER, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, CSP-SACRAMENTO, Respondent.


ORDER and FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

By order filed June 21, 2018, petitioner's habeas application was dismissed, and he was granted thirty days' leave to file an amended civil rights complaint or a request to voluntarily dismiss this action. The thirty day period has now expired, and petitioner has not responded to the court's order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk shall assign a district judge to this case.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Petitioner is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). Dated: August 9, 2018

/s/_________

KENDALL J. NEWMAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE /turn1180.fta.hab


Summaries of

Turner v. Warden, CSP-Sacramento

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 9, 2018
No. 2:18-cv-1180 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 9, 2018)
Case details for

Turner v. Warden, CSP-Sacramento

Case Details

Full title:MICA TURNER, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, CSP-SACRAMENTO, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 9, 2018

Citations

No. 2:18-cv-1180 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 9, 2018)