From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Turner v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
Oct 20, 1995
675 So. 2d 1362 (Ala. Crim. App. 1995)

Opinion

CR-94-1682.

October 20, 1995.

Appeal from Talladega Circuit Court (CV-94-178); Jerry Fielding, Judge.

Roosevelt Turner, pro se.

Jeff Sessions, Atty. Gen., and Beth Poe, Asst. Atty. Gen., for Appellee.


The petitioner, Roosevelt Turner, appeals from the circuit court's denial of his Rule 32, Ala.R.Crim.P., petition for post-conviction relief. The trial court, without making specific findings of fact required by Rule 32.9(d), held that the petitioner's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel lacked merit. The State has requested that this cause be remanded for the judge to make specific findings of fact regarding the ineffective assistance of counsel claim. The State's request is well taken.

Therefore, we remand this cause to the trial court with instructions that the court enter specific findings of fact. A return to remand will be made with this court within 70 days of the date of this opinion.

REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

Note from the Reporter of Decisions: On February 9, 1996, on return to remand, the Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed, without opinion.

All the Judges concur.


Summaries of

Turner v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
Oct 20, 1995
675 So. 2d 1362 (Ala. Crim. App. 1995)
Case details for

Turner v. State

Case Details

Full title:Roosevelt TURNER v. STATE

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Oct 20, 1995

Citations

675 So. 2d 1362 (Ala. Crim. App. 1995)