From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Turner v. Sheriff of Sacramento

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 10, 2011
No. 2:09-cv-0117 WBS KJN P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 10, 2011)

Opinion

No. 2:09-cv-0117 WBS KJN P

08-10-2011

LAFONZO R. TURNER, Plaintiff, v. SHERIFF OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Therefore, plaintiff's request for the appointment of counsel is denied.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's August 1, 2011 request for the appointment of counsel (dkt. no. 119) is denied.

KENDALL J. NEWMAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Turner v. Sheriff of Sacramento

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 10, 2011
No. 2:09-cv-0117 WBS KJN P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 10, 2011)
Case details for

Turner v. Sheriff of Sacramento

Case Details

Full title:LAFONZO R. TURNER, Plaintiff, v. SHERIFF OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 10, 2011

Citations

No. 2:09-cv-0117 WBS KJN P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 10, 2011)