From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Turner v. Sacramento City Fire Dep't.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 9, 2021
2:19-cv-00416-TLN-DB (E.D. Cal. Sep. 9, 2021)

Opinion

2:19-cv-00416-TLN-DB

09-09-2021

ANTHONY DEWAYNE LEE TURNER, Plaintiff, v. SACRAMENTO CITY FIRE DEPT., et al., Defendants.


ORDER

TROY L. NUNLEY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On August 25, 2021, Plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the magistrate judge's order filed August 17, 2021, denying appointment of counsel. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge's orders shall be upheld unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Id. Upon review of the entire file, the Court finds the magistrate judge's ruling was not clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the magistrate judge filed August 17, 2021 (ECF No. 42) is AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Turner v. Sacramento City Fire Dep't.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 9, 2021
2:19-cv-00416-TLN-DB (E.D. Cal. Sep. 9, 2021)
Case details for

Turner v. Sacramento City Fire Dep't.

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY DEWAYNE LEE TURNER, Plaintiff, v. SACRAMENTO CITY FIRE DEPT., et…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 9, 2021

Citations

2:19-cv-00416-TLN-DB (E.D. Cal. Sep. 9, 2021)