From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Turner v. Pliler

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 23, 2006
No. CIV S-02-0543 MCE PAN P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 23, 2006)

Opinion

No. CIV S-02-0543 MCE PAN P.

February 23, 2006


ORDER


On July 27, 2005, defendants filed a motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. Plaintiff has not opposed the motion.

Local Rule 78-230(m) provides in part: "Failure of the responding party to file written opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion. . . ." On April 7, 2003, plaintiff was advised of the requirements for filing an opposition to the motion and that failure to oppose such a motion may be deemed a waiver of opposition to the motion.

Local Rule 11-110 provides that failure to comply with the Local Rules "may be grounds for imposition of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the inherent power of the Court." In the order filed April 7, 2003, plaintiff was advised that failure to comply with the Local Rules may result in a recommendation that the action be dismissed.

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within twenty days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition, if any he has, to the motion for summary judgment or a statement of non-opposition. Failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal of this action be dismissed pursuant Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).


Summaries of

Turner v. Pliler

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 23, 2006
No. CIV S-02-0543 MCE PAN P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 23, 2006)
Case details for

Turner v. Pliler

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY R. TURNER, Plaintiff, v. CHERYL PLILER, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 23, 2006

Citations

No. CIV S-02-0543 MCE PAN P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 23, 2006)