Turner v. Lawson

Full title: ANTHONY RICARDO TURNER, Plaintiff, v. LATISHA LAWSON, et al., Defendants.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Jan 25, 2011

CIV S-10-0057 KJN (TEMP) P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 25, 2011)

Opinion

ANTHONY RICARDO TURNER, Plaintiff, v. LATISHA LAWSON, et al., Defendants. No. CIV S-10-0057 KJN (TEMP) P United States District Court, E.D. California. January 25, 2011

          ORDER & FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

          KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge.

         By order filed December 20, 2010, plaintiff's complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order.

         Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court assign a district court judge to this case; and

         IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).

         These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within twenty-one days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).