From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Turner v. Hidden Lake, Llc.

COURT OF APPEAL FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA
Mar 5, 2015
NO. 2014-CA-0240 (La. Ct. App. Mar. 5, 2015)

Opinion

NO. 2014-CA-0240

03-05-2015

DARRELL TURNER v. HIDDEN LAKE, LLC OF AL AND LIBERTY SURPLUS INSURANCE CORPORATION.


TOBIAS, J., CONCURS IN PART AND DISSENTS IN PART.

As a matter of law, as alleged, the leaking water is not a continuing tort such that the supplemental and amending petition alleging the plaintiff's second fall relates back to the date of the filing of the original petition. I therefore concur in that part of the majority's decision.

However, the plaintiff's first fall that allegedly caused injuries may have created the proverbial "eggshell plaintiff" whose second fall was precipitated by injuries sustained in his first fall, potentially making the defendants liable for damages for the injuries sustained in the second fall. The record on appeal contains insufficient evidence addressing the issue. Ergo, it is premature to rule upon the prescription exception. I therefore dissent in part from the majority decision that the second claim is entirely prescribed.


Summaries of

Turner v. Hidden Lake, Llc.

COURT OF APPEAL FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA
Mar 5, 2015
NO. 2014-CA-0240 (La. Ct. App. Mar. 5, 2015)
Case details for

Turner v. Hidden Lake, Llc.

Case Details

Full title:DARRELL TURNER v. HIDDEN LAKE, LLC OF AL AND LIBERTY SURPLUS INSURANCE…

Court:COURT OF APPEAL FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Mar 5, 2015

Citations

NO. 2014-CA-0240 (La. Ct. App. Mar. 5, 2015)