From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Turner v. Kelso

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 3, 2012
CASE NO. 1:11-cv-00527-DLB PC (E.D. Cal. Feb. 3, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:11-cv-00527-DLB PC DOC. 15

02-03-2012

ANTHONY RICHARDO TURNER, Plaintiff, v. J. CLARK KELSO, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DISMISSING ACTION FOR FAILURE TO OBEY COURT ORDER

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil action on March 29, 2011. Doc. 1. Plaintiff consented to magistrate judge jurisdiction. On October 4, 2011, the Court screened Plaintiff's complaint, and dismissed it with leave to amend within thirty days. Doc. 12. Plaintiff did not respond to this order. On November 28, 2011, the Court issued an order to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to obey a court order. Doc. 15. Plaintiff did not respond to this order. Because Plaintiff has not responded to the Court's orders, dismissal of this action is appropriate. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); In re Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) Prods. Liability Litigation, 460 F.3d 1217, 1227 (9th Cir. 2006); Local Rule 110.

Accordingly, the Court HEREBY ORDERS that this action is dismissed for failure to obey a court order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dennis L. Beck

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Turner v. Kelso

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 3, 2012
CASE NO. 1:11-cv-00527-DLB PC (E.D. Cal. Feb. 3, 2012)
Case details for

Turner v. Kelso

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY RICHARDO TURNER, Plaintiff, v. J. CLARK KELSO, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 3, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. 1:11-cv-00527-DLB PC (E.D. Cal. Feb. 3, 2012)