From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Turner v. Edison Storage Battery Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1928
222 App. Div. 826 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)

Opinion

January, 1928


Order denying defendant's motion to compel plaintiff to elect and to serve an amended complaint reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. Subdivision 9, section 258 of the Civil Practice Act does not differ in its effect from subdivision 9, section 484 of the Code of Civil Procedure, as construed by the cases (Carmody's New York Practice, §§ 170, 180 et seq.), and, therefore, Reed v. Livermore ( 101 App. Div. 254) is decisive of the question herein. Rich, Young and Carswell, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P.J., and Hagarty, J., dissent.


Summaries of

Turner v. Edison Storage Battery Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1928
222 App. Div. 826 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)
Case details for

Turner v. Edison Storage Battery Company

Case Details

Full title:PHILIP TURNER, Respondent, v. EDISON STORAGE BATTERY COMPANY, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 1, 1928

Citations

222 App. Div. 826 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)