From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Turner v. Douglas

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jul 6, 2010
No. 2:09-cv-3445 GEB KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 6, 2010)

Opinion

No. 2:09-cv-3445 GEB KJN P.

July 6, 2010


FINDINGS RECOMMENDATIONS


By order filed March 12, 2010, plaintiff's complaint was dismissed and plaintiff was granted thirty days leave to file an amended complaint. On May 25, 2010, plaintiff was granted an additional twenty-one days in which to file an amended complaint. That period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within twenty-one days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).


Summaries of

Turner v. Douglas

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jul 6, 2010
No. 2:09-cv-3445 GEB KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 6, 2010)
Case details for

Turner v. Douglas

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY TURNER, Plaintiff, v. WILLIAM G. DOUGLAS, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jul 6, 2010

Citations

No. 2:09-cv-3445 GEB KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 6, 2010)