From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Turner v. Dickinson

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 7, 2011
No. CIV S-09-0632 GEB DAD P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 7, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-09-0632 GEB DAD P.

September 7, 2011


ORDER


Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On July 19, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. Defendant Rohrer has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed July 19, 2011 are adopted in full;

2. Defendant's January 14, 2011 motion to dismiss the amended complaint for failure to exhaust administrative remedies (Doc. No. 19) is denied; and

3. Within thirty days from the service of this order, defendant Rohrer is ordered to file his answer.

Dated: September 5, 2011


Summaries of

Turner v. Dickinson

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 7, 2011
No. CIV S-09-0632 GEB DAD P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 7, 2011)
Case details for

Turner v. Dickinson

Case Details

Full title:NATHAN KEVIN TURNER, Plaintiff, v. KATHLINE DICKINSON, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 7, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-09-0632 GEB DAD P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 7, 2011)