From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Turner v. City of Staunton

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Sep 9, 2008
293 F. App'x 187 (4th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 08-1781.

Submitted: August 18, 2008.

Decided: September 9, 2008.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (7:08-cv-00413-sgw).

John Paul Turner, Appellant Pro Se.

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


John Paul Turner appeals the district court's order granting his request to proceed in forma pauperis but dismissing the case as patently frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Turner v. City of Staunton, No. 7:08-cv-00413-sgw (W.D.Va. July 9, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.


Summaries of

Turner v. City of Staunton

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Sep 9, 2008
293 F. App'x 187 (4th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

Turner v. City of Staunton

Case Details

Full title:John Paul "Pops" TURNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF STAUNTON…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Sep 9, 2008

Citations

293 F. App'x 187 (4th Cir. 2008)