From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Turner v. Block

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 29, 2021
2:21-CV-1371-WBS-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 29, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-CV-1371-WBS-DMC-P

09-29-2021

ANTHONY R. TURNER, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT M. BLOCK, Defendant.


FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

DENNIS M. COTA, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 9, 2021, the Court directed Plaintiff to resolve the fee status for this case within 30 days. Plaintiff was warned that failure to resolve the fee status may result in dismissal of this action for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with court rules and orders. See Local Rule 110. To date, Plaintiff has not complied.

Based on the foregoing, the undersigned recommends that this action be dismissed, without prejudice, for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with court rules and orders. See id.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with the court. Responses to objections shall be filed within 14 days after service of objections. Failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal. See Martinez v. Ylst 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).


Summaries of

Turner v. Block

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 29, 2021
2:21-CV-1371-WBS-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 29, 2021)
Case details for

Turner v. Block

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY R. TURNER, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT M. BLOCK, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 29, 2021

Citations

2:21-CV-1371-WBS-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 29, 2021)