From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Turner v. Artis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 19, 2013
No. 2:13-cv-0944 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 19, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:13-cv-0944 CKD P

2013-09-19

JASON TURNER, Plaintiff, v. D. ARTIS, et al., Defendants.


FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

By order filed August 12, 2013, plaintiff's second complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file a third amended complaint was granted. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed a third amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court assign a district court judge to this case; and

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

___________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Turner v. Artis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 19, 2013
No. 2:13-cv-0944 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 19, 2013)
Case details for

Turner v. Artis

Case Details

Full title:JASON TURNER, Plaintiff, v. D. ARTIS, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 19, 2013

Citations

No. 2:13-cv-0944 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 19, 2013)