From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Turnbull v. Jackson-Mitchell

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Nov 28, 2023
1:21CV869 (N.D. Ohio Nov. 28, 2023)

Opinion

1:21CV869

11-28-2023

Michael Turnbull, Petitioner, v. Warden Wanza Jackson-Mitchell, Respondent.


MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER

JOHN R. ADAMS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The Court has examined the Report and Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge submitted in this matter on October 30, 2023. Doc 18. Upon due consideration, and no objections having been filed by the parties, the Court adopts the Report and recommended findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge and incorporates them herein. Therefore, it is ordered that the petition is hereby DENIED.

For the reasons set forth above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus is hereby DENIED and this matter is hereby DISMISSED. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C § 1915(a)(3), the Court certifies that Petitioner may not take an appeal from the Court's decision in good faith, and that there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b). .

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Turnbull v. Jackson-Mitchell

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Nov 28, 2023
1:21CV869 (N.D. Ohio Nov. 28, 2023)
Case details for

Turnbull v. Jackson-Mitchell

Case Details

Full title:Michael Turnbull, Petitioner, v. Warden Wanza Jackson-Mitchell, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Nov 28, 2023

Citations

1:21CV869 (N.D. Ohio Nov. 28, 2023)