From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Turnage v. Hayward Islander Motel

United States District Court, N.D. California
Apr 1, 2010
CASE NO. C08-5618 BZ (N.D. Cal. Apr. 1, 2010)

Opinion

CASE NO. C08-5618 BZ.

April 1, 2010

PAUL L. REIN, Esq. CELIA MCGUINNESS, Esq. LAW OFFICES OF PAUL L. REIN, Attornevs for Plaintiff, FAITH TURNAGE.

WALLACE M. TICE, ESQ. VERONICA H. GARCIA, ESQ. LYNCH, GILARDI GRUMMER Attorneys for Defendants.

HAYWARD ISLANDER MOTEL; STAHL-WOOLRIDGE INVESTMENT PROPERTIES; ROBERT and VIRGINIA M. STAHL PARTNERSHIP, L.P.; and ROBERT STAHL.


CONSENT DECREE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER


1. Plaintiff FAITH TURNAGE filed a Complaint in this action on December 17, 2008, to obtain recovery of damages for his discriminatory experiences, denial of access, and denial of his civil rights, and to enforce provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 ("ADA"), 42 U.S.C. sections 12101 et seq., and California civil rights laws against Defendants HAYWARD ISLANDER MOTEL; STAHL-WOOLRIDGE INVESTMENT PROPERTIES; ROBERT and VIRGINIA M. STAHL PARTNERSHIP, L.P.; and ROBERT STAHL, relating to the condition of their public accommodations as of Plaintiffs visit on or about August 15, 2008, and continuing. Plaintiff has alleged that Defendants violated Title III of the ADA and sections 51, 52, 54, 54.1, 54.3 and 55 of the California Civil Code, and sections 19955 et seq. of the California Health Safety Code by failing to provide full and equal access to their facilities at Hayward Islander Motel (hereinafter "Motel"), located at 29083 Mission Blvd., Hayward, California.

2. Defendants HAYWARD ISLANDER MOTEL; STAHL-WOOLRIDGE INVESTMENT PROPERTIES; ROBERT and VIRGINIA M. STAHL PARTNERSHIP, L.P.; and ROBERT STAHL deny the allegations in the Complaint and by entering into this Consent Decree and Order do not admit liability to any of the allegations in Plaintiffs Complaint filed in this action. The parties hereby enter into this Consent Decree and Order for the purpose of resolving this lawsuit without the need for protracted litigation and without the admission of any liability.

JURISDICTION:

3. The parties to this Consent Decree and Order agree that the Court has jurisdiction of this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 1331 for alleged violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. sections 12101 et seq., and pursuant to supplemental jurisdiction for alleged violations of California Health Safety Code sections 19955 et seq.; California Civil Code sections 51, 52, 54, 54.1, 54.3, and 55; and Title 24, California Code of Regulations.

4. In order to avoid the costs, expense, and uncertainty of protracted litigation, the parties to this Consent Decree and Order agree to entry of this Consent Decree and Order to resolve all claims regarding injunctive relief raised in the Complaint filed with this Court. Accordingly, they agree to the entry of this Consent Decree and Order without trial or further adjudication of any issues of fact or law concerning Plaintiffs claims for injunctive relief.

WHEREFORE, the parties to this Consent Decree and Order hereby agree and stipulate to the Court's entry of this Consent Decree and Order, which provides as follows:

SETTLEMENT OF INJUNCTIVE RELIEF:

5. This Consent Decree and Order shall be a full, complete, and final disposition and settlement of Plaintiffs claims against Defendants for injunctive relief that have arisen out of the subject Complaint. The parties agree that there has been no admission or finding of liability or violation of the ADA and/or California civil rights laws, and this Consent Decree and Order should not be construed as such.

6. The parties agree and stipulate that the corrective work will be performed in compliance with the standards and specifications for disabled access as set forth in the California Code of Regulations, Title 24-2, and Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines, unless other standards are specifically agreed to in this Consent Decree and Order.

a) Remedial Measures: The corrective work agreed upon by the parties are attached hereto as Attachment A. Defendants agree to undertake all of the remedial work as set forth therein. Defendants also agree to institute the policies attached hereto as Attachment B within 15 days. They agree to train all current employees in the new policies within 15 days, and to train new employees in the policies at the time they are hired. b) Timing of Corrective Work for Injunctive Relief: For corrective work not requiring building permits, defendant will complete the work within 45 days of entry of this Consent Decree and Order by the Court. For work requiring building permits, defendants will submit plans for all corrective work to the appropriate governmental agencies within 45 days of the entry of this Consent Decree and Order by the Court. Defendants will commence work within 30 days of receiving approval from the appropriate agencies. Defendants will complete the permitted work within 9 months of commencement. In the event that unforeseen difficulties prevent Defendants from completing any of the agreed-upon injunctive relief, Defendants or their counsel will notify Plaintiffs counsel in writing within 15 days of discovering the delay. Defendants or their counsel will notify Plaintiffs counsel in writing when all the corrective work is completed, and in any case will provide a status report no later than 120 days from the entry of this Consent Decree and Order.

c) Defendants will notify plaintiff in writing at the end of 120 days as to the current status of agreed to injunctive relief, and every 90 days thereafter until all access is provided. If defendants fail to provide injunctive relief on the agreed to timetable and/or fail to provide timely written status notification, plaintiff may file a motion with the court to obtain compliance with these terms. Plaintiff reserves the right to seek additional attorney fees for all compliance work necessitated by defendants' failure to keep their agreement after making reasonable meet and confer efforts to reach agreement on any issues.

DAMAGES, ATTORNEY FEES, LITIGATION EXPENSES AND COSTS:

7. The parties have not reached an agreement regarding Plaintiffs claims for damages, attorney fees, litigation expenses and costs. These issues shall be the subject of further negotiation, litigation, and/or motions to the Court. The parties stipulate that both parties request the Court not dismiss the case, as issues of damages and attorney fees are still before the Court.

ENTIRE CONSENT ORDER:

8. This Consent Decree and Order and Attachment A to this Consent Decree and Order, which is incorporated herein by reference as if fully set forth in this document, constitute the entire agreement between the signing parties on the matters of injunctive relief. No other statement, promise or agreement, either written or oral, made by any of the parties or agents of any of the parties that is not contained in this written Consent Decree and Order shall be enforceable regarding the matters of injunctive relief described herein. This Consent Decree and Order applies to Plaintiffs claims for injunctive relief only and does not resolve Plaintiffs claims for damages, attorney fees, litigation expenses and costs.

CONSENT DECREE AND ORDER BINDING ON PARTIES AND SUCCESSORS IN INTEREST:

9. This Consent Decree and Order shall be binding on Plaintiff FAITH TURNAGE and upon all defendants, including HAYWARD ISLANDER MOTEL; STAHL-WOOLRIDGE INVESTMENT PROPERTIES; ROBERT and VIRGINIA M. STAHL PARTNERSHIP, L.P.; and ROBERT STAHL; and any successors in interest. Defendants have a duty to so notify all such successors in interest of the existence and terms of this Consent Decree and Order during the period of the Court's jurisdiction of this Consent Decree and Order.

MUTUAL RELEASE AND WAIVER OF CIVIL CODE SECTION 1542 AS TO INJUNCTIVE RELIEF ONLY:

10. Each of the parties to this Consent Decree and Order understands and agrees that there is a risk and possibility that, subsequent to the execution of this Consent Decree and Order, any or all of them will incur, suffer or experience some further loss or damage with respect to the lawsuit which are unknown or unanticipated at the time this Consent Decree and Order is signed. Except for all obligations required in this Consent Decree and Order, and excluding plaintiff's pending claims for statutory damages, attorney fees, litigation expenses and costs, the parties intend that this Consent Decree and Order apply to all such further loss with respect to the lawsuit, except those caused by the parties subsequent to the execution of this Consent Decree and Order. Therefore, except for all obligations required in this Consent Decree and Order, this Consent Decree and Order shall apply to and cover any and all claims, demands, actions and causes of action by the parties to this Consent Decree and Order with respect to the lawsuit, whether the same are known, unknown or hereafter discovered or ascertained, and the provisions of Section 1542 of the California Civil Code are hereby expressly waived. Section 1542 provides as follows:

A GENERAL RELEASE DOES NOT EXTEND TO CLAIMS WHICH THE CREDITOR DOES NOT KNOW OR SUSPECT TO EXIST IN HIS OR HER FAVOR AT THE TIME OF EXECUTING THE RELEASE, WHICH IF KNOWN BY HIM OR HER MUST HAVE MATERIALLY AFFECTED HIS SETTLEMENT WITH THE DEBTOR.

This waiver applies to the injunctive relief aspects of this action only and does not include resolution of Plaintiffs claims for damages, attorney fees, litigation expenses and costs.

11. Except for all obligations required in this Consent Decree and Order, and exclusive of the referenced continuing claims for damages, statutory attorney fees, litigation expenses and costs, each of the parties to this Consent Decree and Order, on behalf of themselves, their respective agents, representatives, predecessors, successors, heirs, partners and assigns, releases and forever discharges each other Party and all officers, directors, shareholders, subsidiaries, joint venturers, stockholders, partners, parent companies, employees, agents, attorneys, insurance carriers, heirs, predecessors, and representatives of each other Party, from all claims, demands, actions, and causes of action of whatever kind or nature, presently known or unknown, arising out of or in any way connected with the lawsuit.

TERM OF THE CONSENT DECREE AND ORDER:

12. This Consent Decree and Order shall be in full force and effect for a period of sixty-five (65) months after the date of entry of this Consent Decree and Order, or until the injunctive relief contemplated by this Consent Decree and Order is completed, whichever occurs later. The Court shall retain jurisdiction of this action to enforce provisions of this Consent Decree and Order for sixty-five (65) months after the date of this Consent Decree and Order, or until the injunctive relief contemplated by this Consent Decree and Order is completed, whichever occurs later.

SEVERABILITY:

13. If any term of this Consent Decree and Order is determined by any court to be unenforceable, the other terms of this Consent Decree and Order shall nonetheless remain in full force and effect.

SIGNATORIES BIND PARTIES:

14. Signatories on the behalf of the parties represent that they are authorized to bind the parties to this Consent Decree and Order. This Consent Decree and Order may be signed in counterparts and a facsimile signature shall have the same force and effect as an original signature.

ORDER

Pursuant to stipulation, and for good cause shown, IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Turnage v. Hayward Islander Motel

United States District Court, N.D. California
Apr 1, 2010
CASE NO. C08-5618 BZ (N.D. Cal. Apr. 1, 2010)
Case details for

Turnage v. Hayward Islander Motel

Case Details

Full title:FAITH TURNAGE, Plaintiff, v. HAYWARD ISLANDER MOTEL; STAHL-WOOLRIDGE…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: Apr 1, 2010

Citations

CASE NO. C08-5618 BZ (N.D. Cal. Apr. 1, 2010)