From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Turman v. Sloan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Aug 21, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-cv-01235-BNB (D. Colo. Aug. 21, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12-cv-01235-BNB

08-21-2012

GREGORY L. TURMAN, Applicant, v. BRIGHAM SLOAN, Warden, and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO, Respondents.


MINUTE ORDER

ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE BOYD N. BOLAND

The "Motion to Impose Forfeitures" [ECF No. 17] and the "Motion to Compel Discovery" [ECF No. 18] filed by Applicant on August 20, 2012, are DENIED. Applicant has not demonstrated that he requires discovery in order to complete his Reply to the Pre-Answer Response, and further, the Court does not have the authority to compel the Colorado Court of Appeals to provide documents to Applicant. Likewise, the Court has no authority to compel the Colorado Department of Corrections to pay a "forfeiture" to Applicant based on his transfer to a different facility.


Summaries of

Turman v. Sloan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Aug 21, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-cv-01235-BNB (D. Colo. Aug. 21, 2012)
Case details for

Turman v. Sloan

Case Details

Full title:GREGORY L. TURMAN, Applicant, v. BRIGHAM SLOAN, Warden, and THE ATTORNEY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Aug 21, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 12-cv-01235-BNB (D. Colo. Aug. 21, 2012)