From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Turkmen v. Ashcroft

United States District Court, E.D. New York
Aug 26, 2010
02-CV-2307 (JG) (SMG) (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 26, 2010)

Opinion

02-CV-2307 (JG) (SMG).

August 26, 2010


ORDER


On June 30, 2010, Magistrate Judge Gold issued a report recommending that I grant the motions for leave to intervene and to file a Fourth Amended Complaint made by six proposed intervenors and the remaining Passaic County plaintiffs. The defendants objected to the report insofar as it recommended granting the motion for leave to file another amended complaint.

I agree with Magistrate Judge Gold's recommendation. Therefore, both motions are granted and there is no need to resolve the parties' dispute over what standard of review applies to his recommendation.

The Fourth Amended Complaint shall be unsealed and made available in the public file on September 10, 2010. The intervening two-week period is intended to permit the government to make an application to Magistrate Judge Gold if it wishes portions of the complaint to remain under seal.

So ordered.


Summaries of

Turkmen v. Ashcroft

United States District Court, E.D. New York
Aug 26, 2010
02-CV-2307 (JG) (SMG) (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 26, 2010)
Case details for

Turkmen v. Ashcroft

Case Details

Full title:IBRAHIM TURKMEN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. JOHN ASHCROFT, ROBERT MUELLER…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. New York

Date published: Aug 26, 2010

Citations

02-CV-2307 (JG) (SMG) (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 26, 2010)

Citing Cases

Nytda, Inc. v. City of N.Y.

These precedents instruct the court to take into account "all of the circumstances," including when…

Crespo v. Carvajal

Given the two alternatives, it is not apparent that defending Proposed Intervenors' allegations in this…