Opinion
3:20-cv-00330-MMD-EJY
02-01-2023
L. Edward Humphrey, Esq. - NSB 9066 Patrick O'Rourke, Esq. - NSB 13557 HUMPHREY O'ROURKE PLLC Attorneys for Third-Party Defendant and Counterclaimint Intransia, LLC Humphrey O'Rourke PLLC, Patrick O'Rourke, Esq., NSBN 13557 Attorney for Intransia, LLC DICKINSON WRIGHT PLLC Justin J. Bustos, Esq., NSBN 10320 BRAUNHAGEY & BORDEN LLP ANDREW LEVINE (pro hac vice) DAVID KWASNIEWSKI (pro hac vice) Attorneys for Nature's Bakery, LLC
L. Edward Humphrey, Esq. - NSB 9066 Patrick O'Rourke, Esq. - NSB 13557 HUMPHREY O'ROURKE PLLC Attorneys for Third-Party Defendant and Counterclaimint Intransia, LLC
Humphrey O'Rourke PLLC, Patrick O'Rourke, Esq., NSBN 13557 Attorney for Intransia, LLC
DICKINSON WRIGHT PLLC Justin J. Bustos, Esq., NSBN 10320 BRAUNHAGEY & BORDEN LLP ANDREW LEVINE (pro hac vice) DAVID KWASNIEWSKI (pro hac vice) Attorneys for Nature's Bakery, LLC
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
MIRANDA M. DU, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
Third-Party Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant Nature's Bakery, LLC (“Nature's Bakery”) and Third-Party Defendant and Counterclaimant Intransia, LLC (“Intransia”) have entered into a confidential Settlement Agreement providing for the settlement and release of all claims made by Natures's Bakery and Intransia. The Settlement Agreement provides, as a material term, that the Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the Settlement Agreement or decide any claim for breach of the Settlement Agreement.
THEREFORE, it is hereby stipulated and agreed, by and between the undersigned counsel, and subject to the approval of the Court as follows:
1. Intransia's Counterclaims against Nature's Bakery are dismissed pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, with prejudice and without fees or costs to either of the Parties;
2. Nature's Bakery's Third-Party Claims against Intransia are dismissed pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, with prejudice and without fees or costs to either of the Parties;
3. No other claims remain pending in this litigation and this matter shall be dismissed, however this Court shall retain jurisdiction for the limited pruposes of enforcing the Settlement Agr eement and deciding any claim of breach of the Settlement Agr eement;
IT IS SO ORDERED