From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Turek v. Unum Life Ins. Co. of Am.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Jan 24, 2013
Civil Action No. 12-cv-01321-REB-BNB (D. Colo. Jan. 24, 2013)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12-cv-01321-REB-BNB

01-24-2013

ANNA TUREK, Plaintiff, v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Defendant.


Judge Robert E. Blackburn


ORDER OVERRULING UNUM'S OBJECTIONS

TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S RULINGS ON DISCOVERY

Blackburn, J.

The matters before me are (1) Unum's Objections to Magistrate Judge's Rulings on Discovery [#30], filed December 11, 2012; and 2) Unum's Motion for Reconsideration of Order Denying Unum's Motion To Stay Discovery [#39], filed January 11, 2013. I overrule the objections and deny the motion for reconsideration as moot.

"[#103]" is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific paper by the court's electronic case filing and management system (CM/ECF). I use this convention throughout this order.

Defendant's objections pertain to non-dispositive matters that were referred to the magistrate judge for resolution. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a), I may modify or set aside any portion of a magistrate judge's order which I find to be clearly erroneous or contrary to law. Having reviewed the magistrate judge's order and the transcript of the hearing; the apposite motion, response, and reply; defendant's objections and plaintiff's response and defendant's reply, I conclude that the magistrate judge's order is not clearly erroneous or contrary to law. Given my ruling in that regard, defendant's motion to stay discovery pending my determination of the motion is moot and will be denied on that basis.

THEREFORE, IT IS ordered as follows:

1. That the objections stated in Unum's Objections to Magistrate Judge's Rulings on Discovery [#30], filed December 11, 2012, are OVERRULED; and

2. That Unum's Motion for Reconsideration of Order Denying Unum's Motion To Stay Discovery [#39], filed January 11, 2013, is DENIED AS MOOT.

Dated January 24, 2013, at Denver, Colorado.

BY THE COURT:

_______________

Robert E. Blackburn

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Turek v. Unum Life Ins. Co. of Am.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Jan 24, 2013
Civil Action No. 12-cv-01321-REB-BNB (D. Colo. Jan. 24, 2013)
Case details for

Turek v. Unum Life Ins. Co. of Am.

Case Details

Full title:ANNA TUREK, Plaintiff, v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Jan 24, 2013

Citations

Civil Action No. 12-cv-01321-REB-BNB (D. Colo. Jan. 24, 2013)