From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Turczynski v. Friedman

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 14, 2007
No. CIV S-07-0890 DFL GGH PS (E.D. Cal. Aug. 14, 2007)

Opinion

No. CIV S-07-0890 DFL GGH PS.

August 14, 2007


ORDER


On July 24, 2007, this court ordered plaintiff to show cause why she is unavailable for legal proceedings August 19 through September 14, 2007. Plaintiff responded that she was evicted from her home August 1, is currently homeless, and has airline reservations to travel to Seattle on August 20, to stay with her daughter, with a return flight scheduled for September 4. Plaintiff states that she will be transporting two grandchildren to Seattle and needs to "recuperate from a heavy blow experiencing being [a] homeless person late in my life." Plaintiff states that her daughter has now made arrangements for plaintiff to stay until October 15 and requests further continuance of these proceedings to accommodate the extended deadline. Plaintiff has provided copies of her airline reservations to and from Seattle, August 20 to September 4, and the one-way reservations of her grandchildren on August 20 to Seattle.

Plaintiff's eviction makes evident the ongoing state court proceedings in this case, which defendants assert are controlling. Plaintiff's eviction also demonstrates the importance of resolving the instant case as quickly as possible. Plaintiff, who initiated these proceedings, cannot reasonably expect to maintain the jurisdiction and resources of this court without adhering to the court's calendar and deadlines, which includes hundreds of other cases.

Given the exigencies of plaintiff's living situation, and the opportunity she has temporarily to remedy it, the court will grant a continuance of the motions to dismiss currently scheduled for hearing August 30, 2007, to September 13, 2007, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom No. 10. The court will grant no further continuances. Plaintiff's opposition to all pending motions must be filed no later than August 30, and served upon the defendants by August 27. Failure timely to serve and file an opposition shall be construed as plaintiff's acquiescence to the motions.

These motions were filed June 14 by nBank Mortgage, July 16 by the Friedman's, July 26 by Stewart Title Company, and July 27 by Chicago Title Company; also included are the parties' myriad joinders and Stewart Title Company's motion to strike.

Plaintiff may request, in her timely filed and served opposition, that these matters be submitted for decision on the papers, without oral argument.

Alternatively, should plaintiff determine that she no longer wishes to pursue this federal action, she shall so notify the court on or before August 30, 2007.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Turczynski v. Friedman

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 14, 2007
No. CIV S-07-0890 DFL GGH PS (E.D. Cal. Aug. 14, 2007)
Case details for

Turczynski v. Friedman

Case Details

Full title:DAISY TURCZYNSKI, Plaintiff, v. JAMES FRIEDMAN, individually, SUSAN…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 14, 2007

Citations

No. CIV S-07-0890 DFL GGH PS (E.D. Cal. Aug. 14, 2007)