From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Turcotte v. Glob. Ref. Grp.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jul 15, 2022
1:21-cv-9182-GHW (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 15, 2022)

Opinion

1:21-cv-9182-GHW

07-15-2022

ROBERT TURCOTTE, doing business as Premium Catalytic Converter Refining, Plaintiff, v. GLOBAL REFINING GROUP, INC., Defendant.


ORDER

GREGORY H. WOODS, United States District Judge:

On July 14, 2022, the parties filed a stipulated amended confidentiality agreement and proposed protective order. Dkt. No. 73. The parties failed to comply with the Court's Individual Rule 4(D), which requires, among other things, that the parties file the proposed protective order as an attachment to a cover letter and provide a blackline showing any deviations from the Court's Model Protective Order.

Accordingly, the Court DENIES the parties' request to endorse the proposed protective order.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Turcotte v. Glob. Ref. Grp.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jul 15, 2022
1:21-cv-9182-GHW (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 15, 2022)
Case details for

Turcotte v. Glob. Ref. Grp.

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT TURCOTTE, doing business as Premium Catalytic Converter Refining…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jul 15, 2022

Citations

1:21-cv-9182-GHW (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 15, 2022)