From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tunstall v. Knowles

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 18, 2011
No. 2:08-cv-3176 WBS JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Oct. 18, 2011)

Opinion

No. 2:08-cv-3176 WBS JFM (PC)

10-18-2011

ROBERT TUNSTALL, Plaintiff, v. MIKE KNOWLES, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff initiated this action in propria persona. On October 13, 2011, the court appointed counsel to represent petitioner. Good cause appearing, the pending motion filed by plaintiff in propria persona prior to appointment of counsel will be denied without prejudice. Counsel for the parties will be directed to meet and confer and to file, within forty-five days, a proposed briefing schedule for defendants' April 27, 2011 motion for summary judgment.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's April 7, 2011 motion is denied without prejudice; and

2. Within forty-five days from the date of this order, counsel shall file a joint proposed briefing schedule for defendants' April 27, 2011 motion for summary judgment

_______________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Tunstall v. Knowles

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 18, 2011
No. 2:08-cv-3176 WBS JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Oct. 18, 2011)
Case details for

Tunstall v. Knowles

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT TUNSTALL, Plaintiff, v. MIKE KNOWLES, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 18, 2011

Citations

No. 2:08-cv-3176 WBS JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Oct. 18, 2011)