Opinion
22-7235
06-29-2023
Charles Alonzo Tunstall, Appellant Pro Se.
UNPUBLISHED
Submitted: March 30, 2023
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James J. Dever III, District Judge. (5:22-ct-03214-D)
Charles Alonzo Tunstall, Appellant Pro Se.
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM
Charles Alonzo Tunstall appeals the district court's order and judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. See Tunstall v. Davis, No. 5:22-ct-03214-D (E.D. N.C. Oct. 13, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.