From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tunstall v. Banks

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Nov 4, 2015
2:15-cv-2100 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 4, 2015)

Opinion


ROBERT TUNSTALL, Plaintiff, v. BANKS, et al., Defendants. No. 2:15-cv-2100 KJN P United States District Court, E.D. California. November 4, 2015

          ORDER

          KENDALL J. NEWMAN, MAgistrate Judge.

         Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has requested that this action be dismissed. Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a), plaintiff's request shall be honored.

         Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that

         1. Plaintiff's motion (ECF No. 4) is granted; and

         2. This action is dismissed.


Summaries of

Tunstall v. Banks

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Nov 4, 2015
2:15-cv-2100 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 4, 2015)
Case details for

Tunstall v. Banks

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT TUNSTALL, Plaintiff, v. BANKS, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Nov 4, 2015

Citations

2:15-cv-2100 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 4, 2015)