From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tung v. China Buddhist Ass'n

Court of Appeals of New York
Feb 18, 2016
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 1210 (N.Y. 2016)

Opinion

No. 73 SSM 2

02-18-2016

In the Matter of Ming Tung, et al., Appellants, v. China Buddhist Association, et al., Respondents.

Submitted by Alexander P. Kelly, for appellants. Submitted by Joseph Milano, for respondents.


Submitted by Alexander P. Kelly, for appellants.

Submitted by Joseph Milano, for respondents.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order of the Appellate Division affirmed, without costs, for the reasons stated by Justice Judith J. Gische at the Appellate Division, First Department (124 AD3d 13 [2014]), and certified question not answered upon the ground that it is unnecessary. Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Pigott, Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Stein, Fahey and Garcia concur.

Decided February 18, 2016


Summaries of

Tung v. China Buddhist Ass'n

Court of Appeals of New York
Feb 18, 2016
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 1210 (N.Y. 2016)
Case details for

Tung v. China Buddhist Ass'n

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Ming Tung, et al., Appellants, v. China Buddhist…

Court:Court of Appeals of New York

Date published: Feb 18, 2016

Citations

2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 1210 (N.Y. 2016)