Tulloch v. State

Full title: Daniel TULLOCH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Date published: Aug 13, 2014

145 So. 3d 901 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

Opinion

No. 4D14–1733.

2014-08-13

Daniel TULLOCH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Appeal from order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the SeventeenthJudicial Circuit, Broward County; Andrew L. Siegel, Judge; L.T. Case No. 03–8695CF10A. Daniel Tulloch, Bushnell, pro se. No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the SeventeenthJudicial Circuit, Broward County; Andrew L. Siegel, Judge; L.T. Case No. 03–8695CF10A.
Daniel Tulloch, Bushnell, pro se. No appearance required for appellee.
PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court's summary denial of appellant's amended claim seven following our remand in Tulloch v. State, 86 So.3d 1155 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012). The deposition transcripts conclusively refute appellant's claim. Appellant has attempted to raise additional claims which exceed the scope of our remand. These claims are procedurally barred and were properly denied.

Affirmed. DAMOORGIAN, CONNER and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.