From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tullis v. Valeska

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jul 13, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:15cv90-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Jul. 13, 2015)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:15cv90-MHT (WO)

07-13-2015

LISA McKINLEY TULLIS, Plaintiff, v. D.A. DOUGLAS A. VALESKA, et al., Defendants.


OPINION

Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, plaintiff, a state inmate, filed this lawsuit naming as defendants the district attorney of Houston County and two assistant district attorneys and claiming harassment and conspiracy to violate her civil rights. This lawsuit is now before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that plaintiff's case be dismissed. Also before the court are plaintiff's objections to the recommendation. After an independent and de novo review of the record, the court concludes that the objections should be overruled and the magistrate judge's recommendation adopted, except that the claims against the defendants for prosecuting plaintiff shall be dismissed only on the basis of prosecutorial immunity.

An appropriate judgment will be entered.

DONE, this the 13th day of July, 2015.

/s/ Myron H. Thompson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Tullis v. Valeska

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jul 13, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:15cv90-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Jul. 13, 2015)
Case details for

Tullis v. Valeska

Case Details

Full title:LISA McKINLEY TULLIS, Plaintiff, v. D.A. DOUGLAS A. VALESKA, et al.…

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Jul 13, 2015

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:15cv90-MHT (WO) (M.D. Ala. Jul. 13, 2015)