Tulio v. Sherman

Full title: PEREZ TOMAYO TULIO, Petitioner, v. JAMES SHERMAN, Respondent

Court: United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Aug 18, 2006

Civil Action No. 05-120 Erie (W.D. Pa. Aug. 18, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 05-120 Erie.

August 18, 2006

MEMORANDUM ORDER

SEAN McLAUGHLIN, District Judge

This habeas corpus action was received by the Clerk of Court on April 21, 2005, and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 11], filed on July 31, 2006, recommended that Petitioner's Petition be denied. The parties were allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to file objections. Service was made on Petitioner by certified mail and on Respondent. No objections were filed. After de novo review of the petition and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 18^th day of August, 2006;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED.

The Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 11] of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed on July 31, 2006, is adopted as the opinion of the Court.