From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tuggle v. Johnson

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jan 9, 2023
22-cv-07146-WHO (PR) (N.D. Cal. Jan. 9, 2023)

Opinion

22-cv-07146-WHO (PR)

01-09-2023

STEVEN RAMON TUGGLE, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT J. JOHNSON, et al., Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL DKT. NO. 1

WILLIAM H. ORRICK, United States District Judge.

Plaintiff Steven Ramon Tuggle initiated this action by filing a motion to extend time so that he could exhaust his administrative remedies. (Dkt. No. 1.) However, he failed to comply with the Clerk's Notice to file a complaint. (Dkt. No. 3.)

Accordingly, this federal civil rights action is DISMISSED (without prejudice) for failing to comply with the Clerk's Notice and for failing to prosecute, see Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

Because this dismissal is without prejudice, Tuggle may move to reopen. Any such motion must (i) have the words MOTION TO REOPEN written on the first page;

(ii) contain a complaint on this Court's form; and (iii) full payment for the $402.00 filing fee or a complete application to proceed in forma pauperis.

Tuggle's motion for an extension of time is DENIED. (Dkt. No. 1.)

The Clerk shall terminate all pending motions, enter judgment in favor of defendants, and close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Tuggle v. Johnson

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jan 9, 2023
22-cv-07146-WHO (PR) (N.D. Cal. Jan. 9, 2023)
Case details for

Tuggle v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN RAMON TUGGLE, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT J. JOHNSON, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jan 9, 2023

Citations

22-cv-07146-WHO (PR) (N.D. Cal. Jan. 9, 2023)