Tucker v. Stickman

Full title: DOUGLAS TUCKER, Plaintiff, v. WILLIAM S. STICKMAN, et al., Defendants

Court: United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Dec 1, 2005

Civil Action No. 04-1892 (W.D. Pa. Dec. 1, 2005)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 04-1892.

December 1, 2005

MEMORANDUM ORDER

TERRENCE McVERRY, District Judge

The Plaintiff's complaint was received by the Clerk of Court on December 17, 2004, and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Francis X. Caiazza for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation, filed on November 7, 2005, recommended that the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss be denied. Service was made on the Plaintiff by First Class United States Mail delivered to the State Correctional Institution at Rockview, Rockview, Pennsylvania where he is incarcerated. No Objections have been filed.

After of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following Order is entered:

AND NOW, this 1^st day of December, 2005,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the that the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 24) is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Caiazza (Doc. 32) dated November 7, 2005, is adopted as the opinion of the court.