From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tucker v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
Jun 26, 2020
352 So. 3d 290 (Ala. Crim. App. 2020)

Opinion

CR-18-1244.

06-26-2020

Colby Dewight TUCKER v. STATE of Alabama.

C. Eric Wood , Huntsville, for appellant. Steve Marshall , atty. gen., and Laura I. Cuthbert , asst. atty. gen., for appellee.


C. Eric Wood , Huntsville, for appellant.

Steve Marshall , atty. gen., and Laura I. Cuthbert , asst. atty. gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED BY UNPUBLISHED MEMORANDUM.

Windom, P.J., and Kellum, Cole, and Minor, JJ., concur. McCool, J., dissents, with opinion.

McCOOL, Judge, dissenting.

I respectfully dissent. For the reasons set forth in my dissent in McGowan v. State, 396 So.3d 1 (Ala. Crim. App. 2019), I would reverse Colby Dewight Tucker's sentence, which is illegal, and remand this case to the trial court to conduct a new sentencing hearing. Therefore, I would not reach the issues dealt with by the majority in its unpublished memorandum; thus, I respectfully dissent.


Summaries of

Tucker v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.
Jun 26, 2020
352 So. 3d 290 (Ala. Crim. App. 2020)
Case details for

Tucker v. State

Case Details

Full title:Colby Dewight TUCKER v. STATE of Alabama.

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

Date published: Jun 26, 2020

Citations

352 So. 3d 290 (Ala. Crim. App. 2020)