From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tucker v. Raleigh

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jun 1, 1876
75 N.C. 272 (N.C. 1876)

Opinion

June Term, 1876.

Mandamus.

(For the syllabus, see case between the two parties, ante, page 267.)

APPEAL from Watts, J., at January Term, 1876, of WAKE.

The facts are substantially the same as in the preceding case between the same parties.

There was judgment in favor of the plaintiff according to the prayer of the complaint, and the defendant appealed.

Busbee Busbee for appellant. (273)

Haywood, Fowle and Snow, contra.


An alternative, and not a peremptory mandamus is the proper judgment. See opinion filed in a case between same parties at this term. No error.

PER CURIAM. Judgment accordingly.

Cited: Gas Co. v. Raleigh, post, 274; Fry v. Comrs., 82 N.C. 306.


Summaries of

Tucker v. Raleigh

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jun 1, 1876
75 N.C. 272 (N.C. 1876)
Case details for

Tucker v. Raleigh

Case Details

Full title:W. H. R. S. TUCKER v. THE CITY OF RALEIGH

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Jun 1, 1876

Citations

75 N.C. 272 (N.C. 1876)

Citing Cases

FRY v. COM'RS OF MONTGOMERY

The practice is to issue an alternative then a peremptory writ, and if good cause be not shown for failure to…