From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tucker v. Powell

United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Valdosta Division
Feb 9, 2010
Case No. 7:09-CV-67 (WLS) (M.D. Ga. Feb. 9, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. 7:09-CV-67 (WLS).

February 9, 2010


ORDER


Before the Court is a Report and Recommendation from United States Magistrate Judge Richard L. Hodge filed June 22, 2009. (Doc. 9). It is recommended that Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (Doc. 3) and Emergency Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (Doc. 6) be DENIED. No objection has been filed to date.

Upon full review and consideration of the record, the Court finds that Magistrate Judge Hodge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 9) should be, and hereby is, ACCEPTED, ADOPTED and made the Order of this Court for reason of the findings made and reasons stated therein. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (Doc. 3) is DENIED. Plaintiff's Emergency Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (Doc. 6) is also DENIED.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Tucker v. Powell

United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Valdosta Division
Feb 9, 2010
Case No. 7:09-CV-67 (WLS) (M.D. Ga. Feb. 9, 2010)
Case details for

Tucker v. Powell

Case Details

Full title:DAVID TUCKER, Plaintiff, v. CAROLTON POWELL, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Valdosta Division

Date published: Feb 9, 2010

Citations

Case No. 7:09-CV-67 (WLS) (M.D. Ga. Feb. 9, 2010)

Citing Cases

McCrary v. Adams

When a prisoner has not alleged, much less shown, an actual injury his claim must fail. Nichols v. Head, 2010…