From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tucker v. Parris

United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee
Aug 4, 2021
3:21-CV-187-CLC-HBG (E.D. Tenn. Aug. 4, 2021)

Opinion

3:21-CV-187-CLC-HBG

08-04-2021

ANTHONY TUCKER, Plaintiff, v. M. PARRIS, STACY OAKES, M. AVERY, EDMUND LANE, JENNER CONNER, LYNNDY BYRGE, R/N TONI, W.L. KHAN, NASHVILLE NEUROSURGERY ASSOCIATES, FRAN HALL, and CENTURION OF TENNESSEE, Defendants.


JUDGMENT ORDER

CURTIS L. COLLIER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum and Order filed herewith, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that this prisoner's pro se civil rights action, filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A(b)(1).

Because the Court CERTIFIED in the Memorandum and Order that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, should Plaintiff file a notice of appeal, he is DENIED leave to appeal in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); Fed. R. App. P. 24.

The Clerk is DIRECTED to close the file.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Tucker v. Parris

United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee
Aug 4, 2021
3:21-CV-187-CLC-HBG (E.D. Tenn. Aug. 4, 2021)
Case details for

Tucker v. Parris

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY TUCKER, Plaintiff, v. M. PARRIS, STACY OAKES, M. AVERY, EDMUND…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee

Date published: Aug 4, 2021

Citations

3:21-CV-187-CLC-HBG (E.D. Tenn. Aug. 4, 2021)