Tucker v. Northeast Tree Ser.

2 Citing cases

  1. Boros v. Mark Lobell, Individually & Equip. & Supplies, Co.

    176 So. 3d 689 (La. Ct. App. 2015)   Cited 7 times

    Hubbard v. Jefferson Parish Parks and Recreation, 10–24 (La.App. 5 Cir. 5/25/10), 40 So.3d 1106, 1110.Even though summary judgment procedure is favored, it is not a substitute for trial and is rarely appropriate for judicial determination of subjective facts such as motive, intent, good faith or knowledge. Penalber v. Blount, 550 So.2d 577 (La.1989); Greer v. Dresser Indus., Inc., 98–129 (La.App. 3 Cir. 7/1/98), 715 So.2d 1235, writ denied, 98–2094 (La.11/6/98), 728 So.2d 867; Tucker v. Northeast Louisiana Tree Service, 27,768 (La.App. 2 Cir. 12/6/95), 665 So.2d 672, writ denied, 96–63 (La.3/8/96), 669 So.2d 404. Subjective facts call for credibility evaluations and the weighing of testimony and summary judgment is inappropriate for such determinations. Greer, 715 So.2d 1235; [ 7] Helwick v. Montgomery Ventures Ltd., 95–765 (La. App.

  2. Stadtlander v. Ryan's

    794 So. 2d 881 (La. Ct. App. 2001)   Cited 44 times
    Finding the Agreement viable and controlling over a strong dissent

    Appeals are favored in the law and should be maintained unless a legal ground for dismissal is clearly shown. Tucker v. Northeast Louisiana Tree Service, 27,768 (La.App. 2d Cir. 12/6/95), 665 So.2d 672, writ denied, 96-0063 (La. 3/8/96), 669 So.2d 404; Reed v. Columbia/HCA Information Service, Inc., 99-1315 (La.App. 5th Cir. 4/25/00), 761 So.2d 625; Mack v. Evans, 33,823 (La.App. 2d Cir. 4/7/00), 756 So.2d 1270. An appeal is not to be dismissed for a mere technicality.