From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tucker v. Norris

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Pine Bluff Division
Dec 16, 2009
NO. 5:08-CV-00276-BSM-BD (E.D. Ark. Dec. 16, 2009)

Summary

In Tucker v. Norris, 2009 WL 5066761 (E.D.Ark. 2009), an Arkansas inmate alleged that the Board violated his constitutional rights by denying his release on parole and doing so pursuant to an unconstitutional procedure. He specifically alleged that the governing state statutes and Board regulations created a liberty interest in parole.

Summary of this case from Howell v. Straughn

Opinion

NO. 5:08-CV-00276-BSM-BD.

December 16, 2009


ORDER


The court has received the recommended disposition from Magistrate Judge Beth Deere. After careful review of the recommended disposition, the timely objections received thereto, as well as a de novo review of the record, the court concludes that the recommended disposition should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted as this court's findings in all respects in its entirety.

Accordingly, the petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. No. 2) is DISMISSED with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED


Summaries of

Tucker v. Norris

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Pine Bluff Division
Dec 16, 2009
NO. 5:08-CV-00276-BSM-BD (E.D. Ark. Dec. 16, 2009)

In Tucker v. Norris, 2009 WL 5066761 (E.D.Ark. 2009), an Arkansas inmate alleged that the Board violated his constitutional rights by denying his release on parole and doing so pursuant to an unconstitutional procedure. He specifically alleged that the governing state statutes and Board regulations created a liberty interest in parole.

Summary of this case from Howell v. Straughn
Case details for

Tucker v. Norris

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD SCOTT TUCKER ADC# 122704 PETITIONER v. LARRY NORRIS, Director…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Pine Bluff Division

Date published: Dec 16, 2009

Citations

NO. 5:08-CV-00276-BSM-BD (E.D. Ark. Dec. 16, 2009)

Citing Cases

Smith v. Kelley

Turning to the specifics of the claim at bar, it is clear that "nothing in the Arkansas statutes governing…

Johnson v. Kelley

Following the Court's decision in Clinton v. Bonds, courts in the Eastern District of Arkansas have…