From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tucker v. Nocona Med. Clinic, P.A.

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
Jan 26, 2012
NO. 02-11-00315-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 26, 2012)

Opinion

NO. 02-11-00315-CV

01-26-2012

LINDA DIANE TUCKER AND MYRLE TUCKER APPELLANTS v. NOCONA MEDICAL CLINIC, P.A. APPELLEE


FROM THE 97TH DISTRICT COURT OF MONTAGUE COUNTY


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

We have considered "Appellants' Motion To Dismiss Appeal." It is the court's opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by the party incurring the same, for which let execution issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

PER CURIAM PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and GARDNER, JJ.

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.


Summaries of

Tucker v. Nocona Med. Clinic, P.A.

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
Jan 26, 2012
NO. 02-11-00315-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 26, 2012)
Case details for

Tucker v. Nocona Med. Clinic, P.A.

Case Details

Full title:LINDA DIANE TUCKER AND MYRLE TUCKER APPELLANTS v. NOCONA MEDICAL CLINIC…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

Date published: Jan 26, 2012

Citations

NO. 02-11-00315-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 26, 2012)