Opinion
Argued December 15, 1892
Decided January 17, 1893
Daniel H. McMillan for appellant.
Adelbert Moot for respondent.
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Tucker v. New York Central and Hudson River Rd. Co.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 17, 1893
136 N.Y. 668 (N.Y. 1893)
Summaries of
Tucker v. New York Central and Hudson River Rd. Co.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 17, 1893
136 N.Y. 668 (N.Y. 1893)
Case details for
Tucker v. New York Central and Hudson River Rd. Co.
Case Details
Full title:SAMUEL TUCKER, as Administrator, etc., Respondent, v . THE NEW YORK…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Jan 17, 1893
Citations
136 N.Y. 668 (N.Y. 1893)
Citing Cases
Cahill v. Stone Co.
In Studer v. SouthernPacific Co., 121 Cal. 404, [66 Am. St. Rep. 39, 53 P. 942], the court was not…